Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo iQOO U1
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo iQOO U1 (2020) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 15/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO U1 doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo iQOO U1
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (27/100 vs 23/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (62/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo iQOO U1, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 15 points higher (30/100 vs 15/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO U1 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 23/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (43/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO U1 is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo iQOO U1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 514398 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 746 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1762 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 10, iQOO UI 1.0 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 162.1×76.6×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO U1
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO U1
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO U1
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO U1 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 23/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO U1 (43/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO U1 is a bit better (62/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo iQOO U1?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO U1 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO U1?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO U1 — 15/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo iQOO U1?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO U1 is a better fit for everyday use.