Honor X40 GT Racing vs Motorola Moto E32
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Motorola Moto E32 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 18/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Moto E32 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 16 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Motorola Moto E32 doesn't; the Motorola Moto E32 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Motorola Moto E32
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 16MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 2/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 184g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (70/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Motorola Moto E32, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 12 points higher (30/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 2/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (27/100 vs 2/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E32 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (70/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Motorola Moto E32 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.0×75.0×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Moto E32
- Main: 16MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Motorola Moto E32
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Moto E32
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Motorola Moto E32 (27/100 vs 2/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Moto E32 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (70/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Moto E32?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Motorola Moto E32 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Motorola Moto E32?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Motorola Moto E32 — 18/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Motorola Moto E32?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 2/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Motorola Moto E32?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola Moto E32 is a better fit for everyday use.