Honor X40 GT Racing vs Realme Narzo N63
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Realme Narzo N63 (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 24/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Narzo N63 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo N63 doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Realme Narzo N63
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 189g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Realme Narzo N63, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 6 points higher (30/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo N63 (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo N63 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo N63 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo N63 is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Realme Narzo N63 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc Tiger T612 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 200000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 360 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1250 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 560 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 167.3×76.7×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Realme Narzo N63
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme Narzo N63
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo N63
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo N63 (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo N63 are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo N63 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo N63 is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Realme Narzo N63?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Realme Narzo N63 by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo N63?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Realme Narzo N63 — 24/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Realme Narzo N63?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme Narzo N63 is a better fit for everyday use.