Honor X40 GT Racing vs Realme Narzo 50 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 25/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Narzo 50 Pro has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro doesn't; the Realme Narzo 50 Pro is noticeably lighter (181g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Faster charging: 66W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 181g vs 199g
- Better camera (29/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (73/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Realme Narzo 50 Pro, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 5 points higher (30/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (73/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Realme Narzo 50 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 920 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.4" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 160.2×73.3×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 181 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 6.4" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Realme Narzo 50 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 50 Pro (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (73/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Realme Narzo 50 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Realme Narzo 50 Pro — 25/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Realme Narzo 50 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Realme Narzo 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.