Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco M7 4G
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco M7 4G (2025) on specs and benchmarks. Both devices score the same overall rating of 30/100. Key differences: the Poco M7 4G has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably lighter (199g vs 224g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco M7 4G
- Faster charging: 66W vs 33W
- Lighter: 199g vs 224g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 20/100)
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 43/100)
The Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M7 4G received the same MobileRank rating — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 4G leads (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M7 4G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 4G is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Poco M7 4G (51/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco M7 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 467392 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 466 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1396 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 850 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 171.1×80.5×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 224 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco M7 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco M7 4G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco M7 4G
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M7 4G are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco M7 4G is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Poco M7 4G (51/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco M7 4G?
Both devices scored 30/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Poco M7 4G.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M7 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco M7 4G — 30/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco M7 4G?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco M7 4G is a better fit for everyday use.