Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco C81x
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco C81x (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 23/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C81x has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C81x doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco C81x
- Faster charging: 66W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 42/100)
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 193g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (58/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Poco C81x, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 7 points higher (30/100 vs 23/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Poco C81x (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco C81x are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C81x is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco C81x | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc T7250 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 310000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 600 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1800 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.9" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1640 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 650 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 171.8×77.8×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 193 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco C81x
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco C81x
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco C81x
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Poco C81x (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco C81x are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco C81x is a bit better (58/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco C81x?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Poco C81x by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco C81x?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco C81x — 23/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco C81x?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco C81x?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco C81x is a better fit for everyday use.