Honor X40 GT Racing vs Oppo Reno12 F
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Oppo Reno12 F (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno12 F leads — 33/100 vs 30/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno12 F has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Oppo Reno12 F
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 42/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 187g vs 199g
- Better camera (37/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (66/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Oppo Reno12 F, the Oppo Reno12 F scores 3 points higher (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 F leads (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 F is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo Reno12 F are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 F notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (66/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Oppo Reno12 F | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.1×75.8×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno12 F
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno12 F
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno12 F
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 F is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo Reno12 F are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 F notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (66/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno12 F?
The Oppo Reno12 F edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo Reno12 F?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Oppo Reno12 F — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno12 F?
The Oppo Reno12 F leads on camera score (37/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Oppo Reno12 F?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno12 F is a better fit for everyday use.