Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo iQOO 15
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo iQOO 15 (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads — 86/100 vs 48/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo iQOO 15
What makes Honor X40 GT Racing better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 215g
- Better portability (54/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better camera (78/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo iQOO 15, the Vivo iQOO 15 scores 38 points higher (86/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (78/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (54/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo iQOO 15 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3758268 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.7×76.8×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $599 |
Camera comparison
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 15
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:52 hrs, total 39:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (99/100 vs 75/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (78/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (85/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (54/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing by 38 points (86/100 vs 48/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo iQOO 15 — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo iQOO 15?
The Vivo iQOO 15 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.