Honor X40 GT Racing vs Oppo Reno12 (China)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Oppo Reno12 (China) (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads — 41/100 vs 30/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno12 (China) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Oppo Reno12 (China) is noticeably lighter (179g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Lighter: 179g vs 199g
- Better camera (62/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Oppo Reno12 (China), the Oppo Reno12 (China) scores 11 points higher (41/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) leads (62/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (62/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Oppo Reno12 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 8250 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2412 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, ColorOS 14.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 161.4×74.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno12 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (62/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno12 (China) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (76/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno12 (China)?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) is noticeably better than the Honor X40 GT Racing — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo Reno12 (China)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Oppo Reno12 (China) — 41/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno12 (China)?
The Oppo Reno12 (China) leads on camera score (62/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Oppo Reno12 (China)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno12 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.