Honor X40 GT Racing vs Oppo Reno8 (China)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Oppo Reno8 (China) (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 26/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4500); the Oppo Reno8 (China) is noticeably lighter (179g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Oppo Reno8 (China)
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4500 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Lighter: 179g vs 199g
- Better camera (34/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Oppo Reno8 (China), the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 4 points higher (30/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno8 (China) (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno8 (China) is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo Reno8 (China) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno8 (China) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Oppo Reno8 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.4" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 160.6×73.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno8 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno8 (China)
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno8 (China)
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno8 (China) (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno8 (China) is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo Reno8 (China) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno8 (China) notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (76/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno8 (China)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing edges out the Oppo Reno8 (China) by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo Reno8 (China)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Oppo Reno8 (China) — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno8 (China)?
The Oppo Reno8 (China) leads on camera score (34/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Oppo Reno8 (China)?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno8 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.