Honor X40 GT Racing vs Oppo Reno11
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Oppo Reno11 (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno11 leads — 38/100 vs 30/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno11 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Oppo Reno11 is noticeably lighter (182g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Oppo Reno11
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Overall rating 30/100
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 67W vs 66W
- Lighter: 182g vs 199g
- Higher performance (1/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 43/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (72/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Oppo Reno11, the Oppo Reno11 scores 8 points higher (38/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno11 leads (50/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno11 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno11 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (50/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno11 is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno11 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Oppo Reno11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 806012 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2398 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2412 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 67W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 32 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 950 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 162.4×74.3×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 182 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo Reno11
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno11
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno11 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (1/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno11 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (50/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno11 is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo Reno11 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno11?
The Oppo Reno11 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo Reno11?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Oppo Reno11 — 38/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo Reno11?
The Oppo Reno11 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Oppo Reno11?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno11 is a better fit for everyday use.