Honor X40 GT Racing vs Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads — 59/100 vs 30/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- Lighter: 199g vs 213g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 33/100)
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (62/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (31/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro scores 29 points higher (59/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads (62/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (62/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (31/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (74/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro (51/100 vs 33/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Oppo K14 Turbo Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3037573 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 8358 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1280x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 8.3×None×None mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 213 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2800
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Oppo K14 Turbo Pro
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (62/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (31/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (74/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro (51/100 vs 33/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing by 29 points (59/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro — 59/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro?
The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro leads on performance (62/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Oppo K14 Turbo Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo K14 Turbo Pro is a better fit for active users.