Honor X40 GT Racing vs Oppo A92
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Oppo A92 (2020) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 18/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo A92 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo A92 doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Oppo A92
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 192g vs 199g
- Better camera (29/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (60/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Oppo A92, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 12 points higher (30/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Oppo A92 is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Oppo A92 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 329457 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 321 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1128 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 10; ColorOS 7.1 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 480 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 162.0×75.5×8.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 192 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Oppo A92
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Oppo A92
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Oppo A92
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Oppo A92 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo A92 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Oppo A92 is a bit better (60/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Oppo A92?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Oppo A92 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Oppo A92?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Oppo A92 — 18/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Oppo A92?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo A92 is a better fit for everyday use.