Honor Magic9 Super vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 34/100 (a 53-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 333,647); the ZTE Blade A75 4G is noticeably lighter (189g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
ZTE Blade A75 4G
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 333647
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 378
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1335
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 44/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A75 4G better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 227g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 53 points higher (87/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (99/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (84/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (78/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (91/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (59/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 333647 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 5W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and ZTE Blade A75 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads ZTE Blade A75 4G by 1185.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (99/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (84/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (78/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (91/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (59/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G by 53 points (87/100 vs 34/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 34/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.