Honor Magic7 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $899 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads — 85/100 vs 63/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5850); the Honor Magic7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,030,590); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 223g).
Honor Magic7 Pro
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1030590
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5850 mAh
- Lighter: 178g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $899
- Better portability (74/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Pro vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Honor Magic7 Pro scores 22 points higher (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro leads (82/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 Pro — 82/100, Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 80/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (87/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (82/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (74/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Pro | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 1030590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1280 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5850 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.7×77.1×8.8 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 178 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $249 |
Honor Magic7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 2800x1280
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Pro
- 5850 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic7 Pro and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 Pro leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 202.7% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $650. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $650 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (87/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (82/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic7 Pro (74/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 22 points (85/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Pro and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 85/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on camera score (87/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 Pro or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Pro over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.