Honor Magic7 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Honor Magic7 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; estimated prices are $550 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 leads — 78/100 vs 57/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5650); the Honor Magic7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,030,590); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 199g).
Honor Magic7
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1030590
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (56/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 68/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5650 mAh
- Lighter: 178g vs 199g
- Cheaper: $249 vs $550
- Better portability (74/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Honor Magic7 scores 21 points higher (78/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (56/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (56/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 1030590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1256 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5650 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×75.8×8.0 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 178 g | |
| Price | $550 | $249 |
Honor Magic7
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic7
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1256
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7
- 5650 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic7 and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 202.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $301. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is cheaper by $301.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (56/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (74/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (76/100 vs 68/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 21 points (78/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 leads on camera score (56/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic7 or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic7 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.