Honor Magic8 Pro Air vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Honor Magic8 Pro Air (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads — 89/100 vs 57/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5500); the Honor Magic8 Pro Air is faster in AnTuTu (4,430,255 vs 1,030,590); the Honor Magic8 Pro Air is noticeably lighter (155g vs 178g).
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 4430255 vs 1030590
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 155g vs 178g
- Higher performance (96/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 82/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 74/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5500 mAh
- Overall rating 57/100
Comparing the Honor Magic8 Pro Air vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air scores 32 points higher (89/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (100/100 vs 74/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic8 Pro Air | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 4430255 | 1030590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.3" LTPO OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 64 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 150.5×71.9×6.1 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 155 g | 178 g | |
| Price | — | $249 |
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
- 6.3" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic8 Pro Air and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 329.9% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Magic8 Pro Air
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (87/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (100/100 vs 74/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic8 Pro Air or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro Air significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 32 points (89/100 vs 57/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic8 Pro Air and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro Air has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic8 Pro Air or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads on camera score (87/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic8 Pro Air or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads on performance (96/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic8 Pro Air over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic8 Pro Air is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.