Honor Magic8 Pro Air vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

The Honor Magic8 Pro Air (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads — 89/100 vs 63/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5500); the Honor Magic8 Pro Air is faster in AnTuTu (4,430,255 vs 971,081); the Honor Magic8 Pro Air is noticeably lighter (155g vs 178g).

The Honor Magic8 Pro Air significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 26 points (89/100 vs 63/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Honor Magic8 Pro Air

Performance 97
Display 85
Camera 87
Battery 77
Portability 100
Value for money —

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

Performance 58
Display 82
Camera 61
Battery 58
Portability 74
Value for money 76

What makes Honor Magic8 Pro Air better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4430255 vs 971081
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1061
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 3185
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
  • Lighter: 155g vs 178g

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (77/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 74/100)

What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?

  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5500 mAh

  • Overall rating 63/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor Magic8 Pro Air vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air scores 26 points higher (89/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads (97/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads (87/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (97/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (87/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (100/100 vs 74/100).

Honor Magic8 Pro Air: The Honor Magic8 Pro Air is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra: The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Honor Magic8 Pro Air Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
AnTuTu 4430255 971081
Geekbench Single 3293 1061
Geekbench Multi 10243 3185
Display 6.3" LTPO OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1216x2640 1208x2644
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5500 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 80W 45W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 150.5×71.9×6.1 mm 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm
Weight 155 g 178 g
Launch price — $249

Camera comparison

Honor Magic8 Pro Air

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Display comparison

Honor Magic8 Pro Air

  • 6.3" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1208x2644
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display

Battery and charging

Honor Magic8 Pro Air

  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
77
battery

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
58
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Honor Magic8 Pro Air and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor Magic8 Pro Air MediaTek Dimensity 9500
89/100
4430255 AnTuTu
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
63/100 -356.2%
971081 AnTuTu

Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 356.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Honor Magic8 Pro Air

Price unknown

Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

$249

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (97/100 vs 58/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (85/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (87/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic8 Pro Air notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (100/100 vs 74/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Honor Magic8 Pro Air or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic8 Pro Air significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 26 points (89/100 vs 63/100).

What is the rating of the Honor Magic8 Pro Air and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic8 Pro Air has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic8 Pro Air or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads on camera score (87/100 vs 61/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic8 Pro Air or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic8 Pro Air leads on performance (97/100 vs 58/100).

Should you choose the Honor Magic8 Pro Air over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?

The Honor Magic8 Pro Air is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.