Honor Magic9 Super vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 63/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 971,081); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 971081
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?
- Lighter: 178g vs 227g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 24 points higher (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (74/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 971081 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 178 g | |
| Launch price | — | $249 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 341.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic9 Super
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (78/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (74/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 24 points (87/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on performance (99/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.