Honor Win RT vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Honor Win RT (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $384 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Win RT leads — 75/100 vs 63/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Win RT has the bigger battery (10000 mAh vs 6500); the Honor Win RT is faster in AnTuTu (3,249,469 vs 971,081); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Win RT
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
What makes Honor Win RT better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3249469 vs 971081
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 10000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?
- Lighter: 178g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $384
- Better camera (61/100 vs 45/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 38/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Win RT vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Honor Win RT scores 12 points higher (75/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT leads (80/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Honor Win RT — 80/100, Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win RT (61/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win RT (74/100 vs 38/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Win RT | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3249469 | 971081 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3185 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1272x2800 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 185 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 10000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×76.6×8.3 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 229 g | 178 g | |
| Launch price | $384 | $249 |
Camera comparison
Honor Win RT
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor Win RT
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1272x2800
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Win RT
- 10000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Win RT and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Win RT leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 234.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $135. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $135 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Win RT significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Win RT is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor Win RT (61/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Win RT notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Win RT (74/100 vs 38/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Win RT or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Win RT is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Win RT and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Win RT has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Win RT or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra leads on camera score (61/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Win RT or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Win RT leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor Win RT over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Honor Win RT is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.