Honor Magic7 Lite vs Oppo Reno13 F
The Honor Magic7 Lite (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Oppo Reno13 F (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 Lite leads — 56/100 vs 55/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 Lite has the bigger battery (6600 mAh vs 5800); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Oppo Reno13 F is faster in AnTuTu (862,042 vs 736,675).
Honor Magic7 Lite
Oppo Reno13 F
- Bigger battery: 6600 vs 5800 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 192g
- Better camera (43/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 79/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 862042 vs 736675
- Higher performance (54/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Lite vs the Oppo Reno13 F, the Honor Magic7 Lite scores 1 points higher (56/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Oppo Reno13 F are nearly equal (83/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Oppo Reno13 F are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite is a bit better (63/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Lite | Oppo Reno13 F | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 736675 | 862042 | |
| Geekbench Single | 935 | 935 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2719 | 2719 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 5800 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 2100 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.5×8.0 mm | 162.2×75.1×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 192 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor Magic7 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno13 F
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno13 F
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno13 F
- 5800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic7 Lite and Oppo Reno13 F, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Oppo Reno13 F leads Honor Magic7 Lite by 14.5% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Oppo Reno13 F are nearly equal (83/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Oppo Reno13 F are nearly equal (43/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite is a bit better (63/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Oppo Reno13 F?
The Honor Magic7 Lite edges out the Oppo Reno13 F by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Oppo Reno13 F?
The Honor Magic7 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Oppo Reno13 F — 55/100.
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Lite over the Oppo Reno13 F?
The Honor Magic7 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno13 F is a better fit for everyday use.