Honor Magic7 Lite vs Oppo Reno15 F
The Honor Magic7 Lite (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Oppo Reno15 F (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno15 F leads — 58/100 vs 56/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno15 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6600); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Oppo Reno15 F is faster in AnTuTu (865,334 vs 736,675).
Honor Magic7 Lite
Oppo Reno15 F
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 195g
- Better display (83/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 60/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 865334 vs 736675
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Higher performance (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 63/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic7 Lite vs the Oppo Reno15 F, the Oppo Reno15 F scores 2 points higher (58/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Oppo Reno15 F are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno15 F is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite is a bit better (66/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 Lite | Oppo Reno15 F | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 736675 | 865334 | |
| Geekbench Single | 935 | 935 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2719 | 2719 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×75.5×8.0 mm | 158.2×74.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 195 g | |
| Price | — | $561 |
Honor Magic7 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Oppo Reno15 F
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno15 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7 Lite
- 6600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno15 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Honor Magic7 Lite and Oppo Reno15 F, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Oppo Reno15 F leads Honor Magic7 Lite by 14.9% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Magic7 Lite
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Oppo Reno15 F are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Honor Magic7 Lite are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno15 F is a bit better (68/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 Lite is a bit better (66/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 Lite or the Oppo Reno15 F?
The Oppo Reno15 F edges out the Honor Magic7 Lite by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 Lite and the Oppo Reno15 F?
The Honor Magic7 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Oppo Reno15 F — 58/100.
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 Lite over the Oppo Reno15 F?
The Honor Magic7 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno15 F is a better fit for everyday use.