Oppo Reno15 F vs Vivo V40 Lite
The Oppo Reno15 F (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo V40 Lite (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno15 F leads — 58/100 vs 54/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno15 F has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5500); the Oppo Reno15 F is faster in AnTuTu (865,334 vs 736,675); the Vivo V40 Lite is noticeably lighter (179g vs 195g).
Oppo Reno15 F
Vivo V40 Lite
- Higher AnTuTu: 865334 vs 736675
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5500 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 44W
- Higher performance (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (44/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 54/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)
- Lighter: 179g vs 195g
- Better portability (75/100 vs 60/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno15 F vs the Vivo V40 Lite, the Oppo Reno15 F scores 4 points higher (58/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno15 F leads (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno15 F is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 F (75/100 vs 60/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno15 F | Vivo V40 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 865334 | 736675 | |
| Geekbench Single | 935 | 935 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2719 | 2719 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 158.2×74.9×8.1 mm | 164.4×74.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno15 F
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo V40 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno15 F
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V40 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno15 F
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo V40 Lite
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno15 F and Vivo V40 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Oppo Reno15 F leads Vivo V40 Lite by 17.5% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno15 F and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno15 F is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite notably outperforms the Oppo Reno15 F (75/100 vs 60/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno15 F or the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Oppo Reno15 F edges out the Vivo V40 Lite by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno15 F and the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Oppo Reno15 F has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo V40 Lite — 54/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno15 F over the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Oppo Reno15 F is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo V40 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.