Oppo Reno13 F vs Vivo Y300 Pro
The Oppo Reno13 F (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo Y300 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. Both devices score the same overall rating of 55/100. Key differences: the Vivo Y300 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5800); the Oppo Reno13 F is faster in AnTuTu (862,042 vs 736,675); the Oppo Reno13 F has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 Pro doesn't.
Oppo Reno13 F
Vivo Y300 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 862042 vs 736675
- Lighter: 192g vs 194g
- Higher performance (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (40/100 vs 37/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 55/100)
The Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo Y300 Pro received the same MobileRank rating — 55/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro leads (66/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo Y300 Pro are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo Y300 Pro are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.
| Specification | Oppo Reno13 F | Vivo Y300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 862042 | 736675 | |
| Geekbench Single | 935 | 935 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2719 | 2719 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 162.2×75.1×7.8 mm | 163.4×76.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno13 F
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y300 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno13 F
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno13 F
- 5800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno13 F and Vivo Y300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Oppo Reno13 F leads Vivo Y300 Pro by 17.0% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo Y300 Pro are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo Y300 Pro are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.
Which is better: the Oppo Reno13 F or the Vivo Y300 Pro?
Both devices scored 55/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Oppo Reno13 F.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo Y300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno13 F has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Vivo Y300 Pro — 55/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno13 F over the Vivo Y300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno13 F is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.