Oppo Reno13 F vs Vivo Y300 Pro
The Oppo Reno13 F (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo Y300 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y300 Pro leads — 55/100 vs 54/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 Pro has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5800); the Oppo Reno13 F has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 Pro doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno13 F
Vivo Y300 Pro
What makes Oppo Reno13 F better?
- Lighter: 192g vs 194g
- Better camera (40/100 vs 37/100)
What makes Vivo Y300 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno13 F vs the Vivo Y300 Pro, the Vivo Y300 Pro scores 1 points higher (55/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro leads (66/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo Y300 Pro are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno13 F | Vivo Y300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 737054 | 737054 | |
| Geekbench Single | 930 | 930 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2700 | 2700 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 162.2×75.1×7.8 mm | 163.4×76.4×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno13 F
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y300 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno13 F
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno13 F
- 5800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno13 F and Vivo Y300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo Y300 Pro are nearly equal (40/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 66/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno13 F or the Vivo Y300 Pro?
The Vivo Y300 Pro edges out the Oppo Reno13 F by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo Y300 Pro?
The Oppo Reno13 F has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo Y300 Pro — 55/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno13 F over the Vivo Y300 Pro?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is battery life — better on the Vivo Y300 Pro (66/100 vs 55/100).