Oppo Reno13 F vs Vivo V40 Lite
The Oppo Reno13 F (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Vivo V40 Lite (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. Both devices score the same overall rating of 54/100. Key differences: the Oppo Reno13 F has the bigger battery (5800 mAh vs 5500).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno13 F
Vivo V40 Lite
What makes Oppo Reno13 F better?
- Bigger battery: 5800 vs 5500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Longer battery life (55/100 vs 54/100)
What makes Vivo V40 Lite better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 192g
- Better portability (75/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
The Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo V40 Lite received the same MobileRank rating — 54/100. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 40/100. In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno13 F | Vivo V40 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 737054 | 737054 | |
| Geekbench Single | 930 | 930 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2700 | 2700 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5800 mAh | 5500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2100 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 162.2×75.1×7.8 mm | 164.4×74.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno13 F
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo V40 Lite
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno13 F
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo V40 Lite
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno13 F
- 5800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo V40 Lite
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno13 F and Vivo V40 Lite, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 40/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo V40 Lite are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo V40 Lite is a bit better (75/100 vs 66/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno13 F or the Vivo V40 Lite?
Both devices scored 54/100. They are identical on performance — 52/100 for both. The clearest difference is portability: better on the Vivo V40 Lite (75/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno13 F and the Vivo V40 Lite?
The Oppo Reno13 F has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Vivo V40 Lite — 54/100.
Should you choose the Oppo Reno13 F over the Vivo V40 Lite?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo V40 Lite (75/100 vs 66/100).