Honor Magic5 Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor Magic5 Lite (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $300 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 51/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 592,015); the Honor Magic5 Lite is noticeably lighter (175g vs 230g).
Honor Magic5 Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 175g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $300 vs $950
- Better portability (75/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2003
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 40W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparing the Honor Magic5 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 40 points higher (91/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Honor Magic5 Lite — 44/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic5 Lite (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic5 Lite (96/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic5 Lite (85/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic5 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic5 Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 40W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.6×73.9×7.9 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $300 | $950 |
Honor Magic5 Lite
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Magic5 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic5 Lite
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 40W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Magic5 Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor Magic5 Lite by 86.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $650. Honor Magic5 Lite was $650 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic5 Lite (99/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic5 Lite (96/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic5 Lite (85/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic5 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic5 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor Magic5 Lite by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Honor Magic5 Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic5 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic5 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic5 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic5 Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor Magic5 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.