Honor Magic4 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor Magic4 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 62/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,294,871); the Honor Magic4 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic4
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor Magic4 better?
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Better camera (54/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (82/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 68/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic4 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 7 points higher (69/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic4 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic4 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1294871 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2664 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×74.5×8.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic4
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic4
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2664
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic4
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic4 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor Magic4 by 55.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic4
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 (90/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 is a bit better (82/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic4 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic4 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Honor Magic4 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic4 has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic4 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic4 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic4 is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.