Honor Magic4 Ultimate vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor Magic4 Ultimate (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate leads — 70/100 vs 69/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,294,871); the Honor Magic4 Ultimate is noticeably lighter (242g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor Magic4 Ultimate better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 242g vs 309g
- Better camera (78/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (66/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (85/100 vs 70/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic4 Ultimate vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate scores 1 points higher (70/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate leads (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (66/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic4 Ultimate | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1294871 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1312x2848 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 147 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 64 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 64 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.6×74.7×11.4 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 242 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 12MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1312x2848
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic4 Ultimate and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor Magic4 Ultimate by 55.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic4 Ultimate
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Magic4 Ultimate (90/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (85/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic4 Ultimate and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (66/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 20/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic4 Ultimate or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic4 Ultimate edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic4 Ultimate and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic4 Ultimate has a MobileRank rating of 70/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic4 Ultimate or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic4 Ultimate leads on camera score (78/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic4 Ultimate or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic4 Ultimate over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic4 Ultimate is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.