Honor Magic V vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor Magic V (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 61/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4750); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,294,871); the Honor Magic V is noticeably lighter (288g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic V
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor Magic V better?
- Faster charging: 66W vs 45W
- Lighter: 288g vs 309g
- Better camera (60/100 vs 52/100)
- Better portability (49/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4750 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 68/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic V vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 8 points higher (69/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Magic V (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Honor Magic V are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Magic V (63/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic V notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic V | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1294871 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 9287 | |
| Display | 7.9" Foldable OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1984x2272 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4750 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 42 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Magic UI 6, Google Play Services (market/region dependent) | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 160.4×141.1×6.7 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 288 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic V
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 42MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic V
- 7.9" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 1984x2272
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic V
- 4750 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic V and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor Magic V by 55.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic V
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Magic V (90/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Honor Magic V are nearly equal (70/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic V is a bit better (60/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor Magic V (63/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic V notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (49/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic V or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Honor Magic V by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic V and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic V has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic V or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic V leads on camera score (60/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor Magic V or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic V over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic V is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.