Honor 400 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Honor 400 Lite (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 54/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5230); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 668,462); the Honor 400 Lite is noticeably lighter (171g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Honor 400 Lite — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Lite
Performance 49
Display 80
Camera 43
Battery 51
Portability 84
Value for money
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Performance 91
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 42
What makes Honor 400 Lite better?
  • Lighter: 171g vs 309g

  • Better display (80/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better portability (84/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 668462
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 969
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2321
  • Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5230 mAh
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 35W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 43/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 51/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor 400 Lite vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 15 points higher (69/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 20/100).

Honor 400 Lite: The Honor 400 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor 400 Lite Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 668462 2926532
Geekbench Single 969 3041
Geekbench Multi 2321 9494
Display 6.7" AMOLED 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2412 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5230 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 35W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 108 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 16GB
Storage 256GB 512GB
OS Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP48
Dimensions 161.0×74.6×7.3 mm 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 171 g 309 g
Launch price $2899
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Lite
  • Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera
Display comparison
Honor 400 Lite
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2412
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Lite
  • 5230 mAh
  • Wired: 35W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor 400 Lite and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor 400 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra
54/100
668462 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +77.2%
2926532 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor 400 Lite by 77.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 400 Lite
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
$2899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (91/100 vs 49/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (80/100 vs 70/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 51/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (84/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Honor 400 Lite — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Honor 400 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Honor 400 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 49/100).

Should you choose the Honor 400 Lite over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Honor 400 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.