Honor 400 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

The Honor 400 Lite (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 71/100 vs 54/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 400 Lite has the bigger battery (5230 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 668,462); the Honor 400 Lite is noticeably lighter (171g vs 199g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Honor 400 Lite — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 400 Lite
Performance 49
Display 80
Camera 43
Battery 51
Portability 84
Value for money
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Performance 92
Display 81
Camera 50
Battery 45
Portability 76
Value for money
What makes Honor 400 Lite better?
  • Bigger battery: 5230 vs 4800 mAh
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 171g vs 199g

  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better portability (84/100 vs 76/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 668462
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 969
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2321
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 35W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 49/100)
  • Better camera (50/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Honor 400 Lite vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 17 points higher (71/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (92/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (92/100 vs 49/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Honor 400 Lite are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).

Honor 400 Lite: The Honor 400 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Honor 400 Lite Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 668462 3119308
Geekbench Single 969 3041
Geekbench Multi 2321 9494
Display 6.7" AMOLED 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
Resolution 1080x2412 1828x2584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5230 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 35W 45W
Main camera 108 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 5 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 9 Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65 IP48
Dimensions 161.0×74.6×7.3 mm 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm
Weight 171 g 199 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Honor 400 Lite
  • Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera
Display comparison
Honor 400 Lite
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2412
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1828x2584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Honor 400 Lite
  • 5230 mAh
  • Wired: 35W
  • No wireless charging
51
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Honor 400 Lite and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Honor 400 Lite MediaTek Dimensity 7025 Ultra
54/100
668462 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +78.6%
3119308 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Honor 400 Lite by 78.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor 400 Lite (92/100 vs 49/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Honor 400 Lite are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Honor 400 Lite is a bit better (84/100 vs 76/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 400 Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Honor 400 Lite — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Honor 400 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Honor 400 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Honor 400 Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Honor 400 Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (92/100 vs 49/100).

Should you choose the Honor 400 Lite over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Honor 400 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.