Honor 200 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 200 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $399 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,002,480); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 130); the Honor 200 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 230g).
Honor 200
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 187g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $950
- Better portability (70/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1002480
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2967
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 65/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 65/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Honor 200 — 68/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 (85/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1002480 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2967 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2664x1200 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.6×7.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $950 |
Honor 200
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.95
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor 200
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2664x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 200
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor 200 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 200 by 76.4% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $551. Honor 200 was $551 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (99/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (96/100 vs 65/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 (85/100 vs 65/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 200 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 65/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 200 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.