Honor 200 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 200 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $399 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,002,480); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 130); the Honor 200 is noticeably lighter (187g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 200 better?
- Lighter: 187g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $950
- Better portability (70/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1002480
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1131
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3111
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 65/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 65/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Honor 200 — 58/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (99/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (96/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 (85/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1002480 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1131 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3111 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2664x1200 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 130 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.6×7.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200
- Main: 50MP f/1.95
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2664x1200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 200 by 76.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $551. Honor 200 was $551 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (99/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 (96/100 vs 65/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 (85/100 vs 65/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 200 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 65/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.