Honor 200 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $700 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 200 Pro leads — 74/100 vs 69/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,698,060); the Honor 200 Pro is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $2899
- Better camera (70/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (57/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1698060
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5200 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Honor 200 Pro scores 5 points higher (74/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro leads (70/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro leads (80/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Honor 200 Pro — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (57/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1698060 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 137 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 66W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor 200 Pro by 42.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2199. Honor 200 Pro was $2199 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (90/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (70/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (80/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (57/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 200 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 200 Pro leads on camera score (70/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.