Honor 200 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Both devices score the same overall rating of 74/100. Key differences: the Honor 200 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,698,060); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Lighter: 199g vs 201g
- Better camera (70/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (83/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1698060
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5179
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 75/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
The Honor 200 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide received the same MobileRank rating — 74/100. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro leads (70/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro leads (80/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (98/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (70/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (80/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (74/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1698060 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 137 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 66W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Honor 200 Pro by 57.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (98/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor 200 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (83/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (70/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (80/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (74/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
Both devices scored 74/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (98/100 vs 75/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor 200 Pro leads on camera score (70/100 vs 50/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.