Honor Magic9 Super vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 74/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 3,950,082); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably lighter (201g vs 227g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 3950082
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 98/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 50/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Lighter: 201g vs 227g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 13 points higher (87/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (78/100 vs 50/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (91/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (74/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide by 8.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (99/100 vs 98/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic9 Super notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (78/100 vs 50/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (91/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Honor Magic9 Super (74/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor Magic9 Super is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor Magic9 Super leads on camera score (78/100 vs 50/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.