Honor Magic9 Super vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Honor Magic9 Super (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic9 Super leads — 87/100 vs 84/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic9 Super has the bigger battery (11000 mAh vs 5000); the Honor Magic9 Super is faster in AnTuTu (4,290,399 vs 3,463,142).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic9 Super
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
What makes Honor Magic9 Super better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4290399 vs 3463142
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3601
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10686
- Bigger battery: 11000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 60W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 25W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 96/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 61/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
- Lighter: 214g vs 227g
- Better camera (86/100 vs 78/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic9 Super vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Honor Magic9 Super scores 3 points higher (87/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super leads (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (99/100 vs 96/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Honor Magic9 Super are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic9 Super | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 4290399 | 3463142 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 10686 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 11000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 157 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 10000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×76.7×8.1 mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 227 g | 214 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- Main: 200MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic9 Super
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic9 Super
- 11000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic9 Super and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic9 Super leads Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra by 23.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor Magic9 Super
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic9 Super and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (99/100 vs 96/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra and the Honor Magic9 Super are nearly equal (88/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (86/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic9 Super significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (91/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a bit better (51/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super edges out the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic9 Super and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic9 Super or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic9 Super over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Honor Magic9 Super is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.