Google Pixel 9 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Google Pixel 9 (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $799 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 69/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,561,427); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 143); the Google Pixel 9 is noticeably lighter (198g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9
Performance 73
Display 82
Camera 75
Battery 46
Portability 55
Value for money 50
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Google Pixel 9 better?
  • Lighter: 198g vs 226g
  • Cheaper: $799 vs $899

  • Better portability (55/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1561427
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1850
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4900
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 27W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 73/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 75/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 18 points higher (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (93/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Google Pixel 9 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (96/100 vs 75/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (81/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (86/100 vs 50/100).

Google Pixel 9: The Google Pixel 9 is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Google Tensor G4 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1561427 3269794
Geekbench Single 1850 3228
Geekbench Multi 4900 9553
Display 6.3" Actua OLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2424x1080 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 27W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 143 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 152.8×72.0×8.5 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 198 g 226 g
Price $799 $899
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Front: 10MP
75
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9
  • 6.3" Actua OLED
  • Resolution: 2424x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
82
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 27W
  • Wireless: 15W
46
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4
69/100
1561427 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +52.2%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Google Pixel 9 by 52.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9
$799
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Price difference: $100. Google Pixel 9 is cheaper by $100.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (93/100 vs 73/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Google Pixel 9 are nearly equal (84/100 vs 82/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (96/100 vs 75/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (81/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 (86/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 75/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 73/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Google Pixel 9 is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.