Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. By overall MobileRank rating, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads — 74/100 vs 45/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has the bigger battery (5060 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 12 MP; the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is faster in AnTuTu (1,672,795 vs 824,513); the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing is noticeably lighter (198g vs 221g).

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing by 29 points (74/100 vs 45/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

Performance 74
Display 86
Camera 88
Battery 57
Portability 41
Value for money 58

Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing

Performance 54
Display 83
Camera 13
Battery 35
Portability 59
Value for money —

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1672795 vs 824513
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1900 vs 968
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 5200 vs 2731
  • Bigger battery: 5060 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 37W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP

  • Higher performance (74/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better camera (88/100 vs 13/100)
  • Longer battery life (57/100 vs 35/100)
  • Better display (86/100 vs 83/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing better?

  • Lighter: 198g vs 221g

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 41/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL scores 29 points higher (74/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (74/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (57/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing (74/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing are nearly equal (86/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing (88/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing (57/100 vs 35/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (59/100 vs 41/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
AnTuTu 1672795 824513
Geekbench Single 1900 968
Geekbench Multi 5200 2731
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.4" Super AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1080x2340
Refresh rate 120 Hz —
Battery 5060 mAh 4500 mAh
Charging 37W 33W
Wireless charging 23W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 160 —
Main camera 50 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 0 MP
Front camera 42 MP 16 MP
RAM 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB
OS Android 14 Android 9.0 (Pie); Funtouch 9
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits —
NFC yes no
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 159.5×75.2×8.1 mm
Weight 221 g 198 g
Launch price $1099 —

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • Main: 50MP f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera

Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
13
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
86
display

Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing

  • 6.4" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: —
83
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
57
battery

Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
35
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
74/100
1672795 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
45/100 -102.9%
824513 AnTuTu

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing by 102.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

$1099

Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing (74/100 vs 54/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing are nearly equal (86/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing (88/100 vs 13/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing (57/100 vs 35/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (59/100 vs 41/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing by 29 points (74/100 vs 45/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing — 45/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 13/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on performance (74/100 vs 54/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Racing?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.