Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1099 and $650. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 74/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5060); the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 1,585,585).

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Performance 74
Display 86
Camera 88
Battery 57
Portability 41
Value for money 60
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro XL better?

  • Better camera (88/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 1585585
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1900
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 5200
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5060 mAh
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 37W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 207g vs 221g
  • Cheaper: $650 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 74/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 86/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 41/100)
  • Better value for money (80/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 10 points higher (84/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 57/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (80/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (92/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 86/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (73/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (55/100 vs 41/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (80/100 vs 60/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL: The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Google Tensor G4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 1585585 3119308
Geekbench Single 1900 3041
Geekbench Multi 5200 9494
Display 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2992x1344 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 5060 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 37W 120W
Wireless charging 23W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 160
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 48 MP 50 MP
Front camera 42 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 162.8×76.6×8.5 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 221 g 207 g
Price $1099 $650
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.68
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Telephoto: 48MP
  • Front: 42MP
88
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 6.8" Super Actua LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 2992x1344
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
86
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
  • 5060 mAh
  • Wired: 37W
  • Wireless: 23W
57
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Google Tensor G4
74/100
1585585 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +49.2%
3119308 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Google Pixel 9 Pro XL by 49.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
$1099
Vivo iQOO 13
$650

Price difference: $449. Vivo iQOO 13 is cheaper by $449.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (92/100 vs 74/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (99/100 vs 86/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (73/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (55/100 vs 41/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL (80/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL — the overall rating gap is 10 points.

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL leads on camera score (88/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 74/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.