Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1799 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 64/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,401,321); the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is noticeably lighter (257g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?
- Lighter: 257g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $1799 vs $2899
- Better camera (64/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (78/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1401321
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1707
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4431
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4650 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 21W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 7W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 5 points higher (69/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (63/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (52/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1401321 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1707 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4431 | 9287 | |
| Display | 8.0" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 21W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | — | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2700 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 257 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 8.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 21W
- Wireless: 7W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 52.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1100. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold was $1100 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (90/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (78/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (64/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (63/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (52/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold leads on camera score (64/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.