Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 39/100 (a 36-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 1,401,321); per DXOMark lab testing, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the stronger camera (157 vs 129); the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is noticeably lighter (214g vs 257g).
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Overall rating 39/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 1401321
- Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 4516
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4650 mAh
- Faster charging: 60W vs 21W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 25W vs 7W
- Lighter: 214g vs 257g
- Cheaper: $1299 vs $1799
- Higher performance (84/100 vs 20/100)
- Better camera (86/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 29/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (32/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (20/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 36 points higher (75/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 20/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 29/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (51/100 vs 29/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (32/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (20/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1401321 | 3515964 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1750 | 3601 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4516 | 10686 | |
| Display | 8.0" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 21W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 25W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | 157 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2700 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm | 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 257 g | 214 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $1299 |
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 8.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 21W
- Wireless: 7W
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 60.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is cheaper by $500.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (86/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (51/100 vs 29/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (32/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (20/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 36 points (75/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (84/100 vs 20/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.