Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $1799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 79/100 vs 64/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,780,751 vs 1,401,321); per DXOMark lab testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the stronger camera (151 vs 129); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably lighter (218g vs 257g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?
- Better portability (52/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2780751 vs 1401321
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1707
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 4431
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4650 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 21W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 7W
- Lighter: 218g vs 257g
- Cheaper at launch: $1299 vs $1799
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 15 points higher (79/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (56/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1401321 | 2780751 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1707 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4431 | 9760 | |
| Display | 8.0" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 21W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | 151 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2700 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 257 g | 218 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $1299 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 8.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 21W
- Wireless: 7W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 49.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra was $500 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (91/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (81/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 79/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.