Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $1799 and $1299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 66/100 vs 39/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,800,202 vs 1,401,321); per DXOMark lab testing, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the stronger camera (151 vs 129); the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is noticeably lighter (218g vs 257g).
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Overall rating 39/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 2800202 vs 1401321
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 4516
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4650 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 21W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 7W
- Lighter: 218g vs 257g
- Cheaper: $1299 vs $1799
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 20/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 29/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (20/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 27 points higher (66/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 20/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (45/100 vs 29/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (20/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (67/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (45/100 vs 29/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (20/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1401321 | 2800202 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1750 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4516 | 9760 | |
| Display | 8.0" AMOLED | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 21W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | 151 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2700 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 257 g | 218 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $1299 |
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 8.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 21W
- Wireless: 7W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 50.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $500. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is cheaper by $500.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (67/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (81/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (45/100 vs 29/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (27/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (20/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 27 points (66/100 vs 39/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (67/100 vs 20/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.