Google Pixel 7a vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Google Pixel 7a (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $180 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 38/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4385); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,194,673); the Google Pixel 7a is noticeably lighter (193g vs 309g).
Google Pixel 7a
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 193g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $180 vs $2899
- Better camera (67/100 vs 49/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (58/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (97/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1194673
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1459
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 3451
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4385 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 15W vs 5W
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 22/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel 7a vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 19 points higher (57/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 7a leads (67/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 22/100). In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 7a leads (97/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (67/100 vs 12/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 7a notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (52/100 vs 22/100). In the "design" category, the Google Pixel 7a significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 7a significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (97/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel 7a | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1194673 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1459 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3451 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.1" OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4385 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 5W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 133 | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP67 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 152.0×72.9×9.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $180 | $2899 |
Google Pixel 7a
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 13MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Google Pixel 7a
- 6.1" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel 7a
- 4385 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- Wireless: 5W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Google Pixel 7a and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Google Pixel 7a by 59.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2719. Google Pixel 7a is cheaper by $2719.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (67/100 vs 12/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Google Pixel 7a notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (67/100 vs 49/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 7a (52/100 vs 22/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Google Pixel 7a significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Google Pixel 7a significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (97/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel 7a or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Google Pixel 7a — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 7a and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 7a has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 7a or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 7a leads on camera score (67/100 vs 49/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 7a or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 12/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 7a over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Google Pixel 7a is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.