Fairphone 3+ vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Fairphone 3+ (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 632, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5; launch prices were $489 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 26/100 (a 57-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3040); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 243,691); the Fairphone 3+ is noticeably lighter (189g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Fairphone 3+
Motorola Razr Fold
What makes Fairphone 3+ better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $489 vs $1799
- Overall rating 26/100
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 243691
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 295
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 1037
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3040 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 18/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Fairphone 3+ vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 57 points higher (83/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Fairphone 3+ — 0/100, Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (90/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (91/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (68/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Fairphone 3+ | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 632 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 243691 | 3057215 | |
| Geekbench Single | 295 | 2833 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1037 | 9119 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2160 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3040 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 285 g | |
| Launch price | $489 | $1799 |
Camera comparison
Fairphone 3+
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Fairphone 3+
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2160
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Fairphone 3+
- 3040 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- Wireless charging: no data
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Fairphone 3+ and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Fairphone 3+ by 92.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1310. Fairphone 3+ was $1310 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (90/100 vs 18/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (81/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (91/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (68/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Fold and the Fairphone 3+ are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 57 points (83/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Fairphone 3+ and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Fairphone 3+ has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 83/100.
Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 18/100).
Should you choose the Fairphone 3+ over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.