Fairphone 3+ vs Motorola Razr Fold
The Fairphone 3+ (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 632, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $489 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 13/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3040); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 243,691); the Fairphone 3+ is noticeably lighter (189g vs 285g).
Fairphone 3+
Motorola Razr Fold
- Lighter: 189g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $489 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (63/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 243691
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 295
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1037
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3040 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 26/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Fairphone 3+ vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 64 points higher (77/100 vs 13/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ leads (76/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (91/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Fairphone 3+ significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (63/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (76/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Fairphone 3+ | Motorola Razr Fold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 632 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 243691 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 295 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1037 | 11033 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2160 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3040 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 164 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IPX9 | |
| Dimensions | 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 285 g | |
| Price | $489 | $1799 |
Fairphone 3+
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Fairphone 3+
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2160
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Fairphone 3+
- 3040 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Fairphone 3+ and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Fairphone 3+ by 93.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1310. Fairphone 3+ is cheaper by $1310.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (92/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (91/100 vs 26/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (51/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Fairphone 3+ significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (63/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 3+ significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (76/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 64 points (77/100 vs 13/100).
What is the rating of the Fairphone 3+ and the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Fairphone 3+ has a MobileRank rating of 13/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 77/100.
Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 26/100).
Which is more powerful: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Fairphone 3+ over the Motorola Razr Fold?
The Fairphone 3+ is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.