Fairphone 4 vs Motorola Razr Fold

The Fairphone 4 (2021) runs on the Snapdragon 750G, while the Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $449 and $1799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 19/100 (a 58-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3905); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 517,683); the Fairphone 4 is noticeably lighter (225g vs 285g).

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 by 58 points (77/100 vs 19/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Fairphone 4
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 49
Battery 9
Design 18
Value for money 79
Motorola Razr Fold
Performance 92
Display 100
Camera 91
Battery 51
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Fairphone 4 better?
  • Lighter: 225g vs 285g
  • Cheaper: $449 vs $1799

  • Better design/ergonomics (18/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (79/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 517683
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 601
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1882
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3905 mAh
  • Faster charging: 68W vs 20W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (91/100 vs 49/100)
  • Longer battery life (51/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Fairphone 4 vs the Motorola Razr Fold, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 58 points higher (77/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 4 leads (79/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 (51/100 vs 9/100). In the "design" category, the Fairphone 4 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (18/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 4 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 0/100).

Fairphone 4: The Fairphone 4 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Motorola Razr Fold: The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Fairphone 4 Motorola Razr Fold
Processor Snapdragon 750G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 517683 3942923
Geekbench Single 601 3640
Geekbench Multi 1882 11033
Display 6.3" IPS LCD 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 2480x2200
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 3905 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 20W 68W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
DXOMark (camera) 164
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 48 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 25 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 11 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 6200 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IPX9
Dimensions 162.0×75.5×10.5 mm 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm
Weight 225 g 285 g
Price $449 $1799
Camera comparison
Fairphone 4
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 48MP
  • Front: 25MP
49
camera
Motorola Razr Fold
  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 32MP
91
camera
Display comparison
Fairphone 4
  • 6.3" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Fairphone 4
  • 3905 mAh
  • Wired: 20W
  • No wireless charging
9
battery
Motorola Razr Fold
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 15W
51
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Fairphone 4 and Motorola Razr Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Fairphone 4 Snapdragon 750G
19/100
517683 AnTuTu
Motorola Razr Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
77/100 +86.9%
3942923 AnTuTu

Motorola Razr Fold leads Fairphone 4 by 86.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Fairphone 4
$449
Motorola Razr Fold
$1799

Price difference: $1350. Fairphone 4 is cheaper by $1350.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 (92/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 (91/100 vs 49/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 (51/100 vs 9/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Fairphone 4 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (18/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Fairphone 4 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (79/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Fairphone 4 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Fairphone 4 by 58 points (77/100 vs 19/100).

What is the rating of the Fairphone 4 and the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Fairphone 4 has a MobileRank rating of 19/100, the Motorola Razr Fold — 77/100.

Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 4 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 49/100).

Which is more powerful: the Fairphone 4 or the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Fairphone 4 over the Motorola Razr Fold?

The Fairphone 4 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts.