Fairphone 3+ vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
The Fairphone 3+ (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 632, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $489 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 26/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 3040); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 243,691); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.9mm).
Fairphone 3+
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Lighter: 189g vs 199g
- Cheaper: $489 vs $1099
- Overall rating 26/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 243691
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 295
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1037
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 3040 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 18/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 50/100)
- Better value for money (64/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Fairphone 3+ vs the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 50 points higher (76/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 15/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (92/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (57/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (58/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (68/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (64/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Fairphone 3+ | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 632 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 243691 | 3113462 | |
| Geekbench Single | 295 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1037 | 9494 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 7.0" pOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2160 | 1224x2912 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 3040 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 30W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g | |
| Price | $489 | $1099 |
Fairphone 3+
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Fairphone 3+
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2160
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Fairphone 3+
- 3040 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- Wireless charging: no data
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
We compared Fairphone 3+ and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Fairphone 3+ by 92.2% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $610. Fairphone 3+ is cheaper by $610.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (92/100 vs 18/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (94/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (57/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (58/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (68/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (64/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 50 points (76/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Fairphone 3+ and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Fairphone 3+ has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 18/100).
Should you choose the Fairphone 3+ over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Fairphone 3+ is a better fit for everyday use. The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.