Fairphone 3+ vs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
The Fairphone 3+ (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 632, while the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $489 and $1099. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 26/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 3040); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 243,691); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is thinner (7.2mm vs 9.9mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Fairphone 3+
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
What makes Fairphone 3+ better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $489 vs $1099
- Overall rating 26/100
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 243691
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 295
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1037
- Bigger battery: 4700 vs 3040 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 18/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Fairphone 3+ vs the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 50 points higher (76/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 18/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 15/100). Value score: Fairphone 3+ — 0/100, Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (91/100 vs 18/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (57/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (58/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (68/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Fairphone 3+ | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 632 | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 243691 | 2962094 | |
| Geekbench Single | 295 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1037 | 9287 | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 7.0" pOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2160 | 1224x2912 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 3040 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 68W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 30W | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 158.0×71.8×9.9 mm | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $489 | $1099 |
Camera comparison
Fairphone 3+
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Fairphone 3+
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2160
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Fairphone 3+
- 3040 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- Wireless charging: no data
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Fairphone 3+ and Motorola Razr 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Fairphone 3+ by 91.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $610. Fairphone 3+ was $610 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (91/100 vs 18/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (94/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (57/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (58/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Fairphone 3+ (68/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Fairphone 3+ by 50 points (76/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Fairphone 3+ and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Fairphone 3+ has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 76/100.
Which has the better camera: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Fairphone 3+ or the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 18/100).
Should you choose the Fairphone 3+ over the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.