Apple iPhone Fold vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 77/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,538,751).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Apple iPhone Fold
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Apple iPhone Fold better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 10095
- Overall rating 77/100
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2538751
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (93/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 9 points higher (86/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (93/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2538751 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 10095 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | — | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | $889 |
Camera comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Apple iPhone Fold by 17.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (93/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Apple iPhone Fold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.