Apple iPhone Fold vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Apple iPhone Fold (2026) runs on the Apple A19 Pro, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 77/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,568,709).
Apple iPhone Fold
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Better Geekbench Single: 3970 vs 3100
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10558 vs 10095
- Overall rating 77/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2568709
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Better camera (93/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 82/100)
Comparing the Apple iPhone Fold vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 9 points higher (86/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (93/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Apple iPhone Fold | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Apple A19 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2568709 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3970 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10558 | 10095 | |
| Display | 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1920x2713 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 12 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 4 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | iOS 19 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | — | 229 g | |
| Price | — | $889 |
Apple iPhone Fold
- Main: 48MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 4MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Apple iPhone Fold
- 7.8" Foldable LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1920x2713
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Apple iPhone Fold
- —
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Apple iPhone Fold and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Apple iPhone Fold by 16.9% in our overall performance rating.
Apple iPhone Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 92/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Apple iPhone Fold (93/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the Apple iPhone Fold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Apple iPhone Fold and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Apple iPhone Fold or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Apple iPhone Fold over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Apple iPhone Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.