A16 Bionic vs Dimensity 8300
Specs comparison
| Specification | A16 Bionic | Dimensity 8300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apple | MediaTek | |
| Process node | 4 nm | 4 nm | |
| CPU | 2x Everest @ 3.46 GHz + 4x Sawtooth @ 2.02 GHz | 4x Cortex-A715 @ 3.35 GHz + 4x Cortex-A510 @ 2.2 GHz | |
| GPU | Apple GPU (A16 Bionic) | Arm Mali-G615 MC6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1626008 | 1604305 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2631 | 1375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6602 | 4217 | |
| Memory | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Comparison verdict
Comparing the A16 Bionic vs the Dimensity 8300, the A16 Bionic scores 19 points higher (48/100 vs 29/100). In the "CPU single-core" category, the A16 Bionic leads (57/100 vs 11/100). In the "CPU multi-core" category, the A16 Bionic leads (43/100 vs 15/100).
Benchmarks
Other processor comparisons
Dimensity 8300 vs Kirin 9030S
Dimensity 8300 vs Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
Dimensity 8300 vs Dimensity 8400 Ultra
A16 Bionic vs Kirin 9030S
A16 Bionic vs Dimensity 9000+
Dimensity 8300 vs Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
A16 Bionic vs Tensor G5
A16 Bionic vs Dimensity 9000
Dimensity 8300 vs Tensor G4
Dimensity 8300 vs Dimensity 9200