A16 Bionic vs Dimensity 8300
Specs comparison
| Specification | A16 Bionic | Dimensity 8300 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Apple | MediaTek | |
| Process node | 4 nm | 4 nm | |
| CPU | 2x Everest @ 3.46 GHz + 4x Sawtooth @ 2.02 GHz | 4x Cortex-A715 @ 3.35 GHz + 4x Cortex-A510 @ 2.2 GHz | |
| GPU | Apple GPU (A16 Bionic) | Arm Mali-G615 MC6 | |
| AnTuTu | 1626008 | 1604305 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2631 | 1375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6602 | 4217 | |
| Memory | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
Comparison verdict
Comparing the A16 Bionic vs the Dimensity 8300, the A16 Bionic scores 19 points higher (48/100 vs 29/100). In the "CPU single-core" category, the A16 Bionic leads (57/100 vs 11/100). In the "CPU multi-core" category, the A16 Bionic leads (43/100 vs 15/100).
Benchmarks
Other processor comparisons
Dimensity 8300 vs Kirin 9030S
A16 Bionic vs Dimensity 9000+
Dimensity 8300 vs Dimensity 8400 Ultra
A16 Bionic vs Tensor G5
A17 Pro vs Dimensity 8300
A16 Bionic vs Kirin 9030S
Dimensity 8300 vs Dimensity 9200
A16 Bionic vs Dimensity 9000
A16 Bionic vs Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
A16 Bionic vs Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3