Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 71/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,290,942); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is noticeably lighter (204g vs 224g).
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1290942
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1675
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4453
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 65W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 69/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 86/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 204g vs 224g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 16 points higher (87/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (98/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1200x2608 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 224 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $892 | — |
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
We compared Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra by 205.4% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (98/100 vs 69/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (83/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — 71/100.
Which is more powerful: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 69/100).
Should you choose the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.