Vivo Y32t vs ZTE Blade V40 Smart
The Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (), while the ZTE Blade V40 Smart (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade V40 Smart leads — 29/100 vs 28/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade V40 Smart has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the ZTE Blade V40 Smart is faster in AnTuTu (333,647 vs 303,398); the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y32t
ZTE Blade V40 Smart
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Lighter: 179g vs 215g
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 51/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 35/100)
What makes ZTE Blade V40 Smart better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 333647 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Single: 378 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1335 vs 779
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher performance (27/100 vs 20/100)
- Better display (43/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y32t vs the ZTE Blade V40 Smart, the ZTE Blade V40 Smart scores 1 points higher (29/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Smart is a bit better (27/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Smart and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Blade V40 Smart are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Smart (68/100 vs 35/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y32t | ZTE Blade V40 Smart | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 () | Unisoc Tiger T606 | |
| AnTuTu | 303398 | 333647 | |
| Geekbench Single | 341 | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 779 | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.7" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | — | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Blade V40 Smart
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade V40 Smart
- 6.7" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade V40 Smart
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y32t and ZTE Blade V40 Smart, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Blade V40 Smart leads Vivo Y32t by 9.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Smart is a bit better (27/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade V40 Smart and the Vivo Y32t are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Blade V40 Smart are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade V40 Smart (68/100 vs 35/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Blade V40 Smart?
The ZTE Blade V40 Smart edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Blade V40 Smart?
The Vivo Y32t has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the ZTE Blade V40 Smart — 29/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Blade V40 Smart?
The ZTE Blade V40 Smart leads on performance (27/100 vs 20/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y32t over the ZTE Blade V40 Smart?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is portability — better on the Vivo Y32t (68/100 vs 35/100).