Vivo Y32t vs ZTE Axon 40
The Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (), while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 38/100 vs 11/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 13 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 200g).
Vivo Y32t
ZTE Axon 40
- Lighter: 179g vs 200g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 50/100)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Vivo Y32t vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 27 points higher (38/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100. In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (76/100 vs 50/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo Y32t | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio P70 () | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.5" LCD IPS | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | — | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 179 g | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (50/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 36/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (76/100 vs 50/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t by 27 points (38/100 vs 11/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y32t and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo Y32t has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 38/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (50/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y32t or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y32t over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for everyday use.